博客
关于我
STM32F7 LWIP协议栈TCP速度测试
阅读量:596 次
发布时间:2019-03-12

本文共 3152 字,大约阅读时间需要 10 分钟。

Comparing TCP Reception Performance Between LWIP and DJYIP Protocol Stacks on STM32F7

When evaluating the performance of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks on STM32F7, it is important to understand the differences in TCP packet reception speeds under various conditions. This testing was conducted to ensure consistent hardware and software configurations while assessing the efficiency of the protocol stacks. The following analysis outlines the testing methodology, setup, and results.

Testing Objectives

The primary goal of this testing was to compare the TCP packet reception speeds of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks under identical hardware and software conditions. By maintaining consistency in both hardware platforms and software configurations, we aimed to isolate any differences in performance that could be attributed to the protocol stacks themselves.

Testing Methodology

The testing was conducted using an STM32F7 development board with the following specifications:

  • Hardware Platform: STM32756G-EVAL2
  • Clock Frequency: 200MHz
  • Communication Interface: Direct connection to the sender board

The software configuration for both protocol stacks included:

  • Network Driver Mode: Interrupt-based
  • Buffer Pool Size: 16k bytes
  • TCP Window Size: 2048 bytes (2 * TCP MSS)

The testing process involved:

  • Code Modification: Adjusting the protocol stack configurations in lwipopts.h to optimize for high-throughput performance.
  • Client-Sender Configuration: Implementing a loop to continuously send TCP packets with varying sizes (64 to 1460 bytes).
  • Server-Receiver Configuration: Setting up a receiver loop to capture incoming data and calculate packet reception rates.
  • Testing Results

    The test results revealed significant differences between the two protocol stacks, particularly in terms of TCP reception performance:

    Data Package Size (Bytes) LWIP Reception Speed (Mbps) DJYIP Reception Speed (Mbps)
    1400 3.02 3.18
    1024 4.22 3.16
    512 3.07 3.16
    256 2.02 2.5
    128 0.2±0.2 1.76
    64 0.2±0.2 1.12
    Random (0-1460) 1M (within variation) 2.52

    These results indicate that the LWIP protocol stack generally outperformed the DJYIP stack, particularly for packet sizes of 1024 bytes and larger. It is worth noting that the performance difference for 1024-byte packets might be due to the way LWIP handles packets of sizes that are powers of two, which could be a coincidence or a reflection of underlying characteristics of the protocol stack.

    Implications for Network Performance

    The findings suggest that the choice of protocol stack can significantly impact TCP performance, especially under varying packet size conditions. While LWIP demonstrated slightly better performance for larger packets, it is crucial to consider the specific requirements of the application when selecting a protocol stack. DJYIP, while slightly less efficient for larger packets, might provide more predictable or consistent performance in certain scenarios.

    Future testing could explore additional factors such as packet fragmentation, lower-layer driver optimizations, and network hardware configurations to further refine the performance characteristics of these protocol stacks.

    转载地址:http://kszxz.baihongyu.com/

    你可能感兴趣的文章
    Mysql 脏页 脏读 脏数据
    查看>>
    mysql 自增id和UUID做主键性能分析,及最优方案
    查看>>
    Mysql 自定义函数
    查看>>
    mysql 行转列 列转行
    查看>>
    Mysql 表分区
    查看>>
    mysql 表的操作
    查看>>
    mysql 视图,视图更新删除
    查看>>
    MySQL 触发器
    查看>>
    mysql 让所有IP访问数据库
    查看>>
    mysql 记录的增删改查
    查看>>
    MySQL 设置数据库的隔离级别
    查看>>
    MySQL 证明为什么用limit时,offset很大会影响性能
    查看>>
    Mysql 语句操作索引SQL语句
    查看>>
    MySQL 误操作后数据恢复(update,delete忘加where条件)
    查看>>
    MySQL 调优/优化的 101 个建议!
    查看>>
    mysql 转义字符用法_MySql 转义字符的使用说明
    查看>>
    mysql 输入密码秒退
    查看>>
    mysql 递归查找父节点_MySQL递归查询树状表的子节点、父节点具体实现
    查看>>
    mysql 通过查看mysql 配置参数、状态来优化你的mysql
    查看>>
    mysql 里对root及普通用户赋权及更改密码的一些命令
    查看>>