博客
关于我
STM32F7 LWIP协议栈TCP速度测试
阅读量:596 次
发布时间:2019-03-12

本文共 3152 字,大约阅读时间需要 10 分钟。

Comparing TCP Reception Performance Between LWIP and DJYIP Protocol Stacks on STM32F7

When evaluating the performance of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks on STM32F7, it is important to understand the differences in TCP packet reception speeds under various conditions. This testing was conducted to ensure consistent hardware and software configurations while assessing the efficiency of the protocol stacks. The following analysis outlines the testing methodology, setup, and results.

Testing Objectives

The primary goal of this testing was to compare the TCP packet reception speeds of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks under identical hardware and software conditions. By maintaining consistency in both hardware platforms and software configurations, we aimed to isolate any differences in performance that could be attributed to the protocol stacks themselves.

Testing Methodology

The testing was conducted using an STM32F7 development board with the following specifications:

  • Hardware Platform: STM32756G-EVAL2
  • Clock Frequency: 200MHz
  • Communication Interface: Direct connection to the sender board

The software configuration for both protocol stacks included:

  • Network Driver Mode: Interrupt-based
  • Buffer Pool Size: 16k bytes
  • TCP Window Size: 2048 bytes (2 * TCP MSS)

The testing process involved:

  • Code Modification: Adjusting the protocol stack configurations in lwipopts.h to optimize for high-throughput performance.
  • Client-Sender Configuration: Implementing a loop to continuously send TCP packets with varying sizes (64 to 1460 bytes).
  • Server-Receiver Configuration: Setting up a receiver loop to capture incoming data and calculate packet reception rates.
  • Testing Results

    The test results revealed significant differences between the two protocol stacks, particularly in terms of TCP reception performance:

    Data Package Size (Bytes) LWIP Reception Speed (Mbps) DJYIP Reception Speed (Mbps)
    1400 3.02 3.18
    1024 4.22 3.16
    512 3.07 3.16
    256 2.02 2.5
    128 0.2±0.2 1.76
    64 0.2±0.2 1.12
    Random (0-1460) 1M (within variation) 2.52

    These results indicate that the LWIP protocol stack generally outperformed the DJYIP stack, particularly for packet sizes of 1024 bytes and larger. It is worth noting that the performance difference for 1024-byte packets might be due to the way LWIP handles packets of sizes that are powers of two, which could be a coincidence or a reflection of underlying characteristics of the protocol stack.

    Implications for Network Performance

    The findings suggest that the choice of protocol stack can significantly impact TCP performance, especially under varying packet size conditions. While LWIP demonstrated slightly better performance for larger packets, it is crucial to consider the specific requirements of the application when selecting a protocol stack. DJYIP, while slightly less efficient for larger packets, might provide more predictable or consistent performance in certain scenarios.

    Future testing could explore additional factors such as packet fragmentation, lower-layer driver optimizations, and network hardware configurations to further refine the performance characteristics of these protocol stacks.

    转载地址:http://kszxz.baihongyu.com/

    你可能感兴趣的文章
    MySql中给视图添加注释怎么添加_默认不支持_可以这样取巧---MySql工作笔记002
    查看>>
    Mysql中获取所有表名以及表名带时间字符串使用BetweenAnd筛选区间范围
    查看>>
    Mysql中视图的使用以及常见运算符的使用示例和优先级
    查看>>
    Mysql中触发器的使用示例
    查看>>
    Mysql中设置只允许指定ip能连接访问(可视化工具的方式)
    查看>>
    mysql中还有窗口函数?这是什么东西?
    查看>>
    mysql中间件
    查看>>
    MYSQL中频繁的乱码问题终极解决
    查看>>
    MySQL为Null会导致5个问题,个个致命!
    查看>>
    MySQL为什么不建议使用delete删除数据?
    查看>>
    MySQL主从、环境搭建、主从配制
    查看>>
    Mysql主从不同步
    查看>>
    mysql主从同步及清除信息
    查看>>
    MySQL主从同步相关-主从多久的延迟?
    查看>>
    mysql主从同步配置方法和原理
    查看>>
    mysql主从复制 master和slave配置的参数大全
    查看>>
    MySQL主从复制几个重要的启动选项
    查看>>
    MySQL主从复制及排错
    查看>>
    mysql主从复制及故障修复
    查看>>
    MySQL主从复制的原理和实践操作
    查看>>