博客
关于我
STM32F7 LWIP协议栈TCP速度测试
阅读量:596 次
发布时间:2019-03-12

本文共 3152 字,大约阅读时间需要 10 分钟。

Comparing TCP Reception Performance Between LWIP and DJYIP Protocol Stacks on STM32F7

When evaluating the performance of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks on STM32F7, it is important to understand the differences in TCP packet reception speeds under various conditions. This testing was conducted to ensure consistent hardware and software configurations while assessing the efficiency of the protocol stacks. The following analysis outlines the testing methodology, setup, and results.

Testing Objectives

The primary goal of this testing was to compare the TCP packet reception speeds of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks under identical hardware and software conditions. By maintaining consistency in both hardware platforms and software configurations, we aimed to isolate any differences in performance that could be attributed to the protocol stacks themselves.

Testing Methodology

The testing was conducted using an STM32F7 development board with the following specifications:

  • Hardware Platform: STM32756G-EVAL2
  • Clock Frequency: 200MHz
  • Communication Interface: Direct connection to the sender board

The software configuration for both protocol stacks included:

  • Network Driver Mode: Interrupt-based
  • Buffer Pool Size: 16k bytes
  • TCP Window Size: 2048 bytes (2 * TCP MSS)

The testing process involved:

  • Code Modification: Adjusting the protocol stack configurations in lwipopts.h to optimize for high-throughput performance.
  • Client-Sender Configuration: Implementing a loop to continuously send TCP packets with varying sizes (64 to 1460 bytes).
  • Server-Receiver Configuration: Setting up a receiver loop to capture incoming data and calculate packet reception rates.
  • Testing Results

    The test results revealed significant differences between the two protocol stacks, particularly in terms of TCP reception performance:

    Data Package Size (Bytes) LWIP Reception Speed (Mbps) DJYIP Reception Speed (Mbps)
    1400 3.02 3.18
    1024 4.22 3.16
    512 3.07 3.16
    256 2.02 2.5
    128 0.2±0.2 1.76
    64 0.2±0.2 1.12
    Random (0-1460) 1M (within variation) 2.52

    These results indicate that the LWIP protocol stack generally outperformed the DJYIP stack, particularly for packet sizes of 1024 bytes and larger. It is worth noting that the performance difference for 1024-byte packets might be due to the way LWIP handles packets of sizes that are powers of two, which could be a coincidence or a reflection of underlying characteristics of the protocol stack.

    Implications for Network Performance

    The findings suggest that the choice of protocol stack can significantly impact TCP performance, especially under varying packet size conditions. While LWIP demonstrated slightly better performance for larger packets, it is crucial to consider the specific requirements of the application when selecting a protocol stack. DJYIP, while slightly less efficient for larger packets, might provide more predictable or consistent performance in certain scenarios.

    Future testing could explore additional factors such as packet fragmentation, lower-layer driver optimizations, and network hardware configurations to further refine the performance characteristics of these protocol stacks.

    转载地址:http://kszxz.baihongyu.com/

    你可能感兴趣的文章
    mysql client library_MySQL数据库之zabbix3.x安装出现“configure: error: Not found mysqlclient library”的解决办法...
    查看>>
    MySQL Cluster 7.0.36 发布
    查看>>
    Multimodal Unsupervised Image-to-Image Translation多通道无监督图像翻译
    查看>>
    MySQL Cluster与MGR集群实战
    查看>>
    multipart/form-data与application/octet-stream的区别、application/x-www-form-urlencoded
    查看>>
    mysql cmake 报错,MySQL云服务器应用及cmake报错解决办法
    查看>>
    Multiple websites on single instance of IIS
    查看>>
    mysql CONCAT()函数拼接有NULL
    查看>>
    multiprocessing.Manager 嵌套共享对象不适用于队列
    查看>>
    multiprocessing.pool.map 和带有两个参数的函数
    查看>>
    MYSQL CONCAT函数
    查看>>
    multiprocessing.Pool:map_async 和 imap 有什么区别?
    查看>>
    MySQL Connector/Net 句柄泄露
    查看>>
    multiprocessor(中)
    查看>>
    mysql CPU使用率过高的一次处理经历
    查看>>
    Multisim中555定时器使用技巧
    查看>>
    MySQL CRUD 数据表基础操作实战
    查看>>
    multisim变压器反馈式_穿过隔离栅供电:认识隔离式直流/ 直流偏置电源
    查看>>
    mysql csv import meets charset
    查看>>
    multivariate_normal TypeError: ufunc ‘add‘ output (typecode ‘O‘) could not be coerced to provided……
    查看>>