博客
关于我
STM32F7 LWIP协议栈TCP速度测试
阅读量:596 次
发布时间:2019-03-12

本文共 3152 字,大约阅读时间需要 10 分钟。

Comparing TCP Reception Performance Between LWIP and DJYIP Protocol Stacks on STM32F7

When evaluating the performance of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks on STM32F7, it is important to understand the differences in TCP packet reception speeds under various conditions. This testing was conducted to ensure consistent hardware and software configurations while assessing the efficiency of the protocol stacks. The following analysis outlines the testing methodology, setup, and results.

Testing Objectives

The primary goal of this testing was to compare the TCP packet reception speeds of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks under identical hardware and software conditions. By maintaining consistency in both hardware platforms and software configurations, we aimed to isolate any differences in performance that could be attributed to the protocol stacks themselves.

Testing Methodology

The testing was conducted using an STM32F7 development board with the following specifications:

  • Hardware Platform: STM32756G-EVAL2
  • Clock Frequency: 200MHz
  • Communication Interface: Direct connection to the sender board

The software configuration for both protocol stacks included:

  • Network Driver Mode: Interrupt-based
  • Buffer Pool Size: 16k bytes
  • TCP Window Size: 2048 bytes (2 * TCP MSS)

The testing process involved:

  • Code Modification: Adjusting the protocol stack configurations in lwipopts.h to optimize for high-throughput performance.
  • Client-Sender Configuration: Implementing a loop to continuously send TCP packets with varying sizes (64 to 1460 bytes).
  • Server-Receiver Configuration: Setting up a receiver loop to capture incoming data and calculate packet reception rates.
  • Testing Results

    The test results revealed significant differences between the two protocol stacks, particularly in terms of TCP reception performance:

    Data Package Size (Bytes) LWIP Reception Speed (Mbps) DJYIP Reception Speed (Mbps)
    1400 3.02 3.18
    1024 4.22 3.16
    512 3.07 3.16
    256 2.02 2.5
    128 0.2±0.2 1.76
    64 0.2±0.2 1.12
    Random (0-1460) 1M (within variation) 2.52

    These results indicate that the LWIP protocol stack generally outperformed the DJYIP stack, particularly for packet sizes of 1024 bytes and larger. It is worth noting that the performance difference for 1024-byte packets might be due to the way LWIP handles packets of sizes that are powers of two, which could be a coincidence or a reflection of underlying characteristics of the protocol stack.

    Implications for Network Performance

    The findings suggest that the choice of protocol stack can significantly impact TCP performance, especially under varying packet size conditions. While LWIP demonstrated slightly better performance for larger packets, it is crucial to consider the specific requirements of the application when selecting a protocol stack. DJYIP, while slightly less efficient for larger packets, might provide more predictable or consistent performance in certain scenarios.

    Future testing could explore additional factors such as packet fragmentation, lower-layer driver optimizations, and network hardware configurations to further refine the performance characteristics of these protocol stacks.

    转载地址:http://kszxz.baihongyu.com/

    你可能感兴趣的文章
    Metasploit CGI网关接口渗透测试实战
    查看>>
    Metasploit Web服务器渗透测试实战
    查看>>
    MFC模态对话框和非模态对话框
    查看>>
    Moment.js常见用法总结
    查看>>
    MongoDB出现Error parsing command line: unrecognised option ‘--fork‘ 的解决方法
    查看>>
    mxGraph改变图形大小重置overlay位置
    查看>>
    MongoDB可视化客户端管理工具之NoSQLbooster4mongo
    查看>>
    Mongodb学习总结(1)——常用NoSql数据库比较
    查看>>
    MongoDB学习笔记(8)--索引及优化索引
    查看>>
    mongodb定时备份数据库
    查看>>
    mppt算法详解-ChatGPT4o作答
    查看>>
    mpvue的使用(一)必要的开发环境
    查看>>
    MQ 重复消费如何解决?
    查看>>
    mqtt broker服务端
    查看>>
    MQTT 保留消息
    查看>>
    MQTT 持久会话与 Clean Session 详解
    查看>>
    MQTT工作笔记0007---剩余长度
    查看>>
    MQTT工作笔记0009---订阅主题和订阅确认
    查看>>
    Mqtt搭建代理服务器进行通信-浅析
    查看>>
    MS Edge浏览器“STATUS_INVALID_IMAGE_HASH“兼容性问题
    查看>>