博客
关于我
STM32F7 LWIP协议栈TCP速度测试
阅读量:596 次
发布时间:2019-03-12

本文共 3152 字,大约阅读时间需要 10 分钟。

Comparing TCP Reception Performance Between LWIP and DJYIP Protocol Stacks on STM32F7

When evaluating the performance of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks on STM32F7, it is important to understand the differences in TCP packet reception speeds under various conditions. This testing was conducted to ensure consistent hardware and software configurations while assessing the efficiency of the protocol stacks. The following analysis outlines the testing methodology, setup, and results.

Testing Objectives

The primary goal of this testing was to compare the TCP packet reception speeds of the LWIP and DJYIP protocol stacks under identical hardware and software conditions. By maintaining consistency in both hardware platforms and software configurations, we aimed to isolate any differences in performance that could be attributed to the protocol stacks themselves.

Testing Methodology

The testing was conducted using an STM32F7 development board with the following specifications:

  • Hardware Platform: STM32756G-EVAL2
  • Clock Frequency: 200MHz
  • Communication Interface: Direct connection to the sender board

The software configuration for both protocol stacks included:

  • Network Driver Mode: Interrupt-based
  • Buffer Pool Size: 16k bytes
  • TCP Window Size: 2048 bytes (2 * TCP MSS)

The testing process involved:

  • Code Modification: Adjusting the protocol stack configurations in lwipopts.h to optimize for high-throughput performance.
  • Client-Sender Configuration: Implementing a loop to continuously send TCP packets with varying sizes (64 to 1460 bytes).
  • Server-Receiver Configuration: Setting up a receiver loop to capture incoming data and calculate packet reception rates.
  • Testing Results

    The test results revealed significant differences between the two protocol stacks, particularly in terms of TCP reception performance:

    Data Package Size (Bytes) LWIP Reception Speed (Mbps) DJYIP Reception Speed (Mbps)
    1400 3.02 3.18
    1024 4.22 3.16
    512 3.07 3.16
    256 2.02 2.5
    128 0.2±0.2 1.76
    64 0.2±0.2 1.12
    Random (0-1460) 1M (within variation) 2.52

    These results indicate that the LWIP protocol stack generally outperformed the DJYIP stack, particularly for packet sizes of 1024 bytes and larger. It is worth noting that the performance difference for 1024-byte packets might be due to the way LWIP handles packets of sizes that are powers of two, which could be a coincidence or a reflection of underlying characteristics of the protocol stack.

    Implications for Network Performance

    The findings suggest that the choice of protocol stack can significantly impact TCP performance, especially under varying packet size conditions. While LWIP demonstrated slightly better performance for larger packets, it is crucial to consider the specific requirements of the application when selecting a protocol stack. DJYIP, while slightly less efficient for larger packets, might provide more predictable or consistent performance in certain scenarios.

    Future testing could explore additional factors such as packet fragmentation, lower-layer driver optimizations, and network hardware configurations to further refine the performance characteristics of these protocol stacks.

    转载地址:http://kszxz.baihongyu.com/

    你可能感兴趣的文章
    MySql 手动执行主从备份
    查看>>
    Mysql 批量修改四种方式效率对比(一)
    查看>>
    mysql 批量插入
    查看>>
    Mysql 报错 Field 'id' doesn't have a default value
    查看>>
    MySQL 报错:Duplicate entry 'xxx' for key 'UNIQ_XXXX'
    查看>>
    Mysql 拼接多个字段作为查询条件查询方法
    查看>>
    mysql 排序id_mysql如何按特定id排序
    查看>>
    Mysql 提示:Communication link failure
    查看>>
    mysql 插入是否成功_PDO mysql:如何知道插入是否成功
    查看>>
    Mysql 数据库InnoDB存储引擎中主要组件的刷新清理条件:脏页、RedoLog重做日志、Insert Buffer或ChangeBuffer、Undo Log
    查看>>
    mysql 数据库中 count(*),count(1),count(列名)区别和效率问题
    查看>>
    mysql 数据库备份及ibdata1的瘦身
    查看>>
    MySQL 数据库备份种类以及常用备份工具汇总
    查看>>
    mysql 数据库存储引擎怎么选择?快来看看性能测试吧
    查看>>
    MySQL 数据库操作指南:学习如何使用 Python 进行增删改查操作
    查看>>
    MySQL 数据库的高可用性分析
    查看>>
    MySQL 数据库设计总结
    查看>>
    Mysql 数据库重置ID排序
    查看>>
    Mysql 数据类型一日期
    查看>>
    MySQL 数据类型和属性
    查看>>